Introduction While regulated entities (operators, CAMOs, AMOs, aerodromes, ANSPs, design and production organisations) are responsible for developing, implementing, and maintaining these elements, CAs carry the parallel responsibility to ensure each element is present, appropriate to the organisation’s scope, demonstrably operating, and producing effective safety outcomes. Through MSAT, CAs move beyond compliance monitoring into performance-based oversight,…

Introduction This document considers typical structure of an EASA Compliant ERP – however to note that each operator should configure For an aviation operator regulated under EASA rules, the Emergency Response Plan (ERP) must be a controlled, structured, and systematically maintained document that aligns with EASA’s regulatory framework, industry best practices, and ICAO standards. The…

Sofema Aviation Services (SAS) considers the core elements of the ICAO SMS Framework The 12 Elements of the ICAO SMS Framework offer a powerful blueprint for building a proactive, risk-based safety management system. Implementation is not automatic. It requires strong leadership, active  and a relentless focus on continuous improvement. that successfully embed the 12 elements…

Sofema Aviation Services (SAS) www.sassofia.com considers the key aspects of the GACAR Part 5 Safety Management System Introduction GACAR Part 5 presents a robust framework for ensuring aviation safety through a systematic approach to: Risk management, Assurance, and Continuous improvement. Implementation challenges, especially in the areas of hazard identification, safety promotion, and recordkeeping, require thoughtful adaptation…