Sofema Aviation Services (SAS) (www.sassofia.com) considers key elements found in both the GACA and EASA Safety Management Systems (SMS) with Focus on Ground Operations
While both GACA and EASA SMS frameworks share common objectives—such as proactive safety management, continuous monitoring, and the promotion of safety culture—there are distinct differences in how these objectives are implemented.
- GACA emphasizes the practical, real-time application of safety management principles tailored to local conditions, whereas EASA emphasizes data-driven decision-making and EU-wide standardization of safety practices.
- Both systems are crucial for maintaining safety in ground operations, but the context in which they are applied leads to differences in approach.
Introduction
Safety Management Systems (SMS) serve as the foundation of modern aviation safety behaviour, ensuring that organizations systematically manage safety risks. Both the General Authority of Civil Aviation (GACA) in Saudi Arabia and the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) have established SMS requirements governing the safety practices of aviation organizations under their respective jurisdictions.
Overview of SMS in GACA (Saudi Arabia)
In Saudi Arabia, GACA mandates the implementation of SMS under GACAR Part 5 – Safety Management Systems.
- This regulation applies to all aviation organizations, including air operators, maintenance organizations, and ground-handling companies.
- GACA Part 5 aligns with global standards set by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), particularly ICAO Annex 19, which covers safety management.
The GACAR Part 5 SMS framework is built on four key components, similar to ICAO’s recommendations:
- Safety Policy and Objectives: Establishes the organization’s commitment to safety, assigning clear roles and responsibilities.
- Safety Risk Management (SRM): Focuses on hazard identification, risk assessment, and appropriate risk controls.
- Safety Assurance: Ensures continuous monitoring of safety performance through audits and data collection.
- Safety Promotion: Involves communication, training, and fostering of a safety culture across the organization.
A key feature of GACA’s approach is its focus on practical implementation, particularly in ground operations where risks like aircraft collisions, equipment failure, and improper baggage handling are prevalent. SMS must be tailored to the complexity and scale of operations.
Overview of SMS in EASA (European Union)
In the European context, EASA mandates the implementation of SMS under regulations such as (EU) No 965/2012, (EU) No 1321/2014, and (EU) No 139/2014, the latter specifically governing aerodrome safety and management systems.
Like GACAR Part 5, EASA regulations align closely with ICAO standards. The EASA framework is also structured around four main components:
- Safety Policy and Objectives: Defines safety goals aligned with EASA regulations.
- Safety Risk Management (SRM): Focuses on hazard identification, risk assessment, and risk control measures.
- Safety Assurance: Ensures continuous monitoring through audits and safety data reviews.
- Safety Promotion: Involves safety training and promoting a safety-oriented culture.
EASA emphasizes data-driven decision-making and requires tools for collecting and analyzing safety data, which is critical in ground operations like fueling, aircraft towing, and apron management. SMS must be integrated with existing management systems and regularly audited for continuous improvement.
Similarities Between GACA and EASA SMS Requirements
- Alignment with ICAO Standards: Both GACA and EASA frameworks derive from ICAO Annex 19 and follow internationally recognized standards for safety management.
- Four Components of SMS: Both systems require organizations to establish an SMS based on Safety Policy and Objectives, Safety Risk Management, Safety Assurance, and Safety Promotion.
- Proactive Risk Management: Both emphasize SRM, requiring hazard identification, risk assessment, and control implementation.
- Safety Assurance: Continuous monitoring through audits and data collection is core to both systems.
- Focus on Safety Culture: Both frameworks promote a positive safety culture through training and communication.
- Documentation and Recordkeeping: Both systems require thorough documentation of SMS activities, ensuring transparency and accountability.
Key Differences Between GACA and EASA SMS Requirements
- Regulatory Scope and Focus:
- GACA: Applies broadly to all aviation activities, with a focus on Saudi Arabian ground operations, integrating local conditions, climate, and cultural factors.
- EASA: More prescriptive, with regulations requiring harmonized safety practices across the EU, supported by data-driven methodologies.
- Integration with Broader Regulatory Requirements:
- GACA: SMS integrates with GACAR Parts 6 (Air Operator Certification) and 9 (Airworthiness), covering all aspects of aircraft operations.
- EASA: Integrates SMS with other EU regulations, particularly under Regulation (EU) No 139/2014 for aerodrome safety, and is part of the broader EU aviation safety regime.
- Safety Data and Reporting:
- GACA: Focuses on practical, real-time risk mitigation with local reporting mechanisms emphasizing immediate corrective actions.
- EASA: Requires more systematic safety data analysis, with aerodrome operators adopting advanced data systems integrated with EU-wide reporting platforms like ECCAIRS.
- Cultural and Operational Context:
- GACA: Considers local factors like workforce practices and desert climate in developing safety protocols.
- EASA: Emphasizes harmonization across member states, with a focus on technological advancements and data analytics in safety management.
Next Steps
Follow this link to our Library to find & download related documents for Free.
For more information and training support on SMS within KSA, consider the courses GACAR Part 5 – SMS Implementation Review, Development, and Risk Management Processes – 5 Days.
For questions and comments, please email: team@sassofia.com.
Tags:
EASA, Ground Operations, ICAO Standards, GACA, SAS blogs, Safety Management Systems (SMS), Saudi Arabia, European Union, Environments, Safety Risk Management (SRM), SMS Requirements
